Saturday, September 17, 2011

Google needs an Asprin - shareholder goes Google

Google is an international search engine giant, a company that seems to do no wrong. Each application and development that they are a huge success. Surprisingly, in the world of federal law and the international transport of drugs, Google has done a lot of harm. If you thought that ever hear you these words associated with the company, keep reading to discover what happened. Not only has Google received a fine by the Federal Government for the error, but they are now to be pursued by one of their shareholders to properly represent their financial gains over the years.


The problem is quite simple, at least at its root. Google ran advertisements that were created by pharmacies. These pharmacies online offered to sell drugs and medicines to the clients of the United States. They sold things that had not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, something which is illegal under US law. The Government fined Google for hosting these ads run the same if they were clearly in violation of the law. Even if the people who work at Google did not realize that they were breaking the law, it is their responsibility to understand what is right and what is bad.


For this failure, Google received a fine of $ 500 million. It is a substantial fine, even by the standards of huge companies. The Government has clearly wants to attract the attention of Google and pharmacies involved. He wants to tell people that this is not something that can be done and that it will be not be ignored. They make a statement in addressing a company who has had a very good track record in the past, at least as far as the law is concerned.


The case of the Court who came on is because a shareholder, a person who has purchased the part of Google based on the financial statements that Google put out to report its earnings, noticed that they never reported the earnings from these Canadian pharmacies. They never claimed the money as he was coming from outside the country. It is the different financial perspectives that he should have been, which was the same that lie to the shareholders.


One thing is very interesting in this case, is that under-reporting of this money did not make Google seem less attractive. The shareholder who brought the case on would probably have been more likely to buy Google stock if it was clear how much money Google was really in. However, at the same time, this is not that what Google was right. They are always obliged to tell their shareholders, as persons who have given their money to make the company what it is today, what they do. This is how the arrangement, and it cannot be ignored. While the shareholder cannot obtain five hundred million dollars, the chances are that Google will not be able to win this case.


on guest author: Jennifer sparkles is a claims analyst by day and freelance during his free time writer.  If you want to reduce your car costs you can try comparison shopping.  You can get quotes for insurance free car in just a few minutes to Kanetix and decide policy most suited to your needs. Adjust your franchise and see how it changes your rate.  When you bundle with your police car, that you can get home insurance compounded savings.


It's a single article on SEO Office with exclusivity.

Popularity: 1% [?]Shareholder continues to Googlewhy to buy google stockthe flow of comments post subscribe or leave a trackback

The simple ways to up your traffik

0 comments: